Re: Util dependency on Collections?

[Jari Worsley]

James Strachan wrote:
>
> Though how about making it a SequencedHashMap rather than a
> SequencedHashtable? Hashtable is so 1999 :-)
> 
>

I still don't like the name. SequencedHashMap , whatever, says to me
"What sequence?". Someone in another post said about a "ListMap"
implementation. Isn't that exactly the same idea as this one, just with
a better name?

Jari

--
Jari Worsley
Senior Programmer
Hyperlink Interactive Ltd