2008/9/4, Sebastien LELONG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > * can we agree to remove prototype definitions ? That is, the stuff > without "is" you (Joep) put at the beginning of the file so you can keep > important func/prodedure at the top of the file. Why ? Because my script is > finding twice the same proc/func (yes it doesn't check for a "is"). I think > it's not necesseray to keep them since I can detect private proc/func and put > them at the end of the html doc. Well, this means the procedures must be ordered from low-level at the top to high-level at the bottom and I like them the other way around. Removing the prototypes because the validation script does not support them is practical sollution and I don't want to force you into changing the script. So it's okay for now. But... I think it is a good idea to put prototype support (with low priority) on the to-do list of the validation script, so it will be there at some time.
> * can we agree to remove the "summary of all procedures and functions found > in this lib, at the beginning of the file" ? This is redundant, a duplication > of the same information, and api doc script is here to do this job (summary), > automatically. Okay with me! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
