Issue 24: Migration: i2c http://code.google.com/p/jallib/issues/detail?id=24
Comment #8 by robhamerling: Why do you qualify I2C as a language extension? In my mind language extensions are generally useable procedures/functions such as data manipulations, mathematics, etc.. I see I2C as a protocol for communications with other devices, and therefore would qualify it as 'periferal'. And I would keep all I2C includes together and hav one I2C directory for all I2C material. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
