2008/9/23, Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Maybe better if we change the filename of 'our' version! > > > I think that's a good idea, its better not using an old name because > than you don't know if you have the good lib ore not. > Maybe add to all jallib include files "_v2" like chipdef_v2.jal then > you can immediately see it's a jallib include file from the repository > and still the name is familiar to everybody.
I agree we have to rename the files, but suggest something that refers to this JalLib project, like _jl.jal. This since the includes from with the compiler are already intended for V2 only. Joep --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
