Hoi Seb,

I updated svn and found the files, I am sorry you still had to change
things in my file
I thought I changed the lcd_st7026 to jallib structure.
I know you have a program to check the libs, and I can find it in the
tool map, but how does it work?


> ? I mean, we 'd talked about using the -i option of jalv2 compiler:

I could not find the –i compiler option in the jalopts document, what
is it doing?

>
>   jalv2 -i board_16f877a_dwarf .jal i2c_test_l0.jal
>
> This being integrated within a nice jallib wrapper script (dunno yet what it
> would look like).
>
> So I think tests may not be included, even if it sounds logical they could
> from your example. Let's assume we agree tests files (not samples) should be
> prefixed with "test_", and can be included (only for testing purpose, not as
> a start for a new project). Samples, on the contrary, aren't designed to
> included (would be a very bad idea), and are stored in "by_device" map.

In my opinion a test file and I sample are the same thing, both should
be a main file being able to compile and work.
When you don’t want comment on every (outside the lib used) procedure
or function in the lib it self, you should
at least make a sample file showing every (usable) function and
procedure how it’s used and how
it works, making it therefore also a test file.


> Finally, when releasing, libs (ie. everything in "include") will be flatten,
> all others things, like samples and tests, won't. From there, people do what
> they want: if they want to flatten more, they can do it, we @ jallib provide
> the "standard" way to use a jallib release: a dir contains all the libs,
> then a separate structure containing samples and tests (and doc) help users
> to use these libs

I understand your point but I also understand Joep’s point, I also
think its tricky to give samples
or test files the same name as the lib even if a good map structure is
separating them.
Every lib should have IMHO a unique name and adding prefixes and
suffixes can make it more easier
even if the complete map structure is gone (just theoretically of
course).

anyway this is only my opinion, what ever you all do is fine with me.

greetz


Richard
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to