>
>
> The JSG is not consistent:
>
> procedures and functions must be named as:
>
>     * <function>_<whatever> if you want to have a common API
>
>
> is not the same as:
>
> All external names (of global variables, constants, procedures and
> functions available to application programs) must start with a prefix unique
> to the library.
>
>
> because "function" can't be (and shouldn't be) specific to a library
>

If all vars, consts, procs, funcs in a library start with "blabla_", don't
we have a prefix unique to the library ?

As I said a previous post today, the main confusion seems to come from the
meaning of "function". You consider function as "get", "read", "write",
etc... I consider function as "lcd", "temperature", "i2c", "serial", etc...
Maybe, for what I mean, "device_family" should be better.


Seb

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to