On 22 Oct 2008, at 20:22 , Sebastien LELONG wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > The validation wiki page is quite filled, even if most of us did > not vote for > everything (this probably shows this method might not be the most > effective, > more, this page also store test results that should be stored in > the testing > matrix, but the jallib script was not ready. Anyway...). I've also > seen > improvements on libs + more tests, so maybe that's time to beta- > release, > before moving to something else. > > Except some -1 for blink samples which are outdated since Rob did > the trick > (again), there are only positive votes. Some row has no vote at > all. If > everybody have performed the tests they need (did you run tests > again last > device files commit ?), here's what we can do: > > 1. wait until this WE, so everyone has time to read this mail... release already.
> 2. copy the files listed in this page to "validated", except those > which > don't have votes. I can do this, but if someone else wants to do > it, no > problem, just tell us. (Eur, add your last committed samples if you > feel > confortable with them !) How? > 3. ... release ! (using "make release" on "validated" map) OK. > > Well... for 3., I see few things that need to be dealt with: > > * LICENSE file. Are we happy with current one or not ? Some weird spacing in the bullet points: > * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright > notice, > this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. > * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above > copyright notice, > this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the > documentation > and/or other materials provided with the distribution. > * Neither the name of jallib nor the names of its contributors > may be used to > endorse or promote products derived from this software without > specific prior > written permission. "and/or" and "written" are indented wrong. I don't mind the second bullet, even if it is impossible. Just let it stay there. > * are we all happy with README files ? I am. > * are we all happy with how things are packaged ? (see example in > this > group's files section) ??? had no time to check it. Should be fine. > * we need to write an "[ANN] jallib 0.1 beta released !" mail for > jallist > (and for jallib here for our own ego), where we explain what's been > done, > why, how to download the package, we need testers, contributors, > people who > can give feedback, and also we thank all the respective authors of > original > libs which have been included here, bla, bla, bla, blabla, bla... We do. > So... Do we release ? Yes. > > Seb > PS: I vote "yes" :) > -- > Sébastien LELONG > http://www.sirloon.net > http://sirbot.org > > > > --- ir EE van Andel [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.fiwihex.nl Fiwihex B.V. Wierdensestraat 74, NL7604BK Almelo, Netherlands tel+31-546-491106 fax+31-546-491107 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
