On 24 Oct 2008, at 09:39 , Rob Hamerling wrote: >>> expected when testing other PICs. So it would be best test all PICs! >> As for 10, 12, and 16F, I'm willing to commit money. Tell me which >> PICs >> you *don't* have. I'll buy and test. > > Check the table with blink tests to see my collection. For the > baseline
Where? You can't mean this: http://code.google.com/p/jallib/wiki/TestingMatrix or this: G5-fiwihex:~/jalv2/jallib/validated/sample/blink eur$ ls b12f675.jal b16f777.jal b16f877.jal b16f877a.jal > and midrange it covers about all, only missing are some bigger (in > number of pins) brothers and sisters of the same family. Well, then there is nothing to buy. > My 18F collection is not so complete. Especially 18F6xxxx and up are > missing because these do not come in PDIP packages, which makes > them not > so easy for breadboard work. > >> BTW: we should not test PICs that just have less pins or less memory. > > Agreed, waste of money and time. So which PICs should I buy? > > Regards, Rob. > > > -- > Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) > > > > --- ir EE van Andel [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.fiwihex.nl Fiwihex B.V. Wierdensestraat 74, NL7604BK Almelo, Netherlands tel+31-546-491106 fax+31-546-491107 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
