>
> I haven't checked all, but what I saw was good!
> It's now the responsibility of the author (or adapter) of the lib to
> provide a good format, and that's the way it should to my opinion!
One important thing... About the Description: field, you (we all) have to
not indent the content. I mean:
Description: blabla
blabla
blabla
is bad.
Description: blabla
blabla
blabla
is good.
I cannot know (and wouldn't want, actually...), while parsing the file, if
these spaces have to be kept, or are for indent. The fact is, since the
script only takes the content, that is removes the "Description:" text, it
can produce weird results. But that's what the author provived, right ?...
See for example (randomly picked :))
*
http://jallib.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/unvalidated/doc/html/serial_hw_int_cts.html
*
http://jallib.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/unvalidated/doc/html/lcd_hd44780_4.html
Seb
--
Sébastien Lelong
http://www.sirloon.net
http://sirbot.org
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
