> > The test matrix should produce a result matrix. Then humans should look > into the failed tests. >
Yeah, developers will look at failed tests, users will look at successful ones, searching for a nice and highly supported target chip :) > There is no way to automate library testing on all PICs. You can only do > compile testing. > Yes, and no. See my reply to Joep. > Still, I like the idea of automatic testing and generating test files. For > instance when a new PIC comes out, we could auto-generate lost of samples > for it. > This might be too early to do this, however. > This is issue 37. I hope it'll come to reality soon. Seb -- Sébastien Lelong http://www.sirloon.net http://sirbot.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
