Hi Rob,

This is weird. The bot works on the trunk, and in the unvalidated map. It's
not aware of any beta-0.1 branch. It just takes samples and tries to compile
them against libs, samples & libs being taken in /trunk/unvalidated".

For example, PIC 18f86j90. I've searched in
https://jallib.googlecode.com/svn/branches/jallib-0.1beta and in
https://jallib.googlecode.com/svn/trunk , there's no trace of a 18f86j90.jal
lib, but there's a sample in trunk/unvalidated. There're only traces of a
sample in trunk/unvalidated :

$ LANG=C svn info blink_18f86j90.jal
Path: blink_18f86j90.jal
Name: blink_18f86j90.jal
URL:
https://jallib.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/unvalidated/sample/by_device/18f86j90/blink_18f86j90.jal
Repository Root: https://jallib.googlecode.com/svn
Repository UUID: 52ce04ab-a751-0410-9c8b-31cceb902f08
Revision: 546
Node Kind: file
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: robhamerling
Last Changed Rev: 527
Last Changed Date: 2008-11-07 20:31:21 +0100 (Fri, 07 Nov 2008)
Text Last Updated: 2008-11-10 07:55:05 +0100 (Mon, 10 Nov 2008)
Checksum: e12a8469e4d83f2ebcae0e53f7f6b19a

This is on "trunk/unvalidated/...". Now:

$ jalv24h -s ../../../include/device blink_18f86j90.jal
jal 2.4 (compiled Sep 15 2008)
generating p-code
blink_18f86j90.jal:22: cannot open '18f86j90.jal'
blink_18f86j90.jal:26: unknown pragma target: osc
blink_18f86j90.jal:26: "osc" not defined
blink_18f86j90.jal:26: '=' expected (got 'hs')
blink_18f86j90.jal:26: "hs" not defined
...

This can be expected, because:

$ ls unvalidated/include/device/18f86j90.jal

gives nothing...


Did I miss something ?

Cheers,
Seb

2008/11/17 Rob Hamerling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> 10 samples can't be compiled...
> List:
>
> lcd_hd44780_tmp_4_line.jal
> lcd_hd44780_tmp_8_line.jal
> lcd_format.jal
> read_co2_t6603.jal
> blink_18f86j90.jal
> blink_18lf14k22.jal
> blink_18f87j90.jal
> blink_18f66j90.jal
> blink_18lf13k22.jal
> blink_18f67j90.jal
>
> The failing blink samples are for new device files which came with MPlab
> 8.15 and for which there are no device files in 0.1beta. Apparently you
> try to compile samples in the unvalidated tree with libraries and device
> files in the beta-0.1 tree.  I would say this is an invalid combination,
> you are not testing fixed libraries!
>
> Regards, Rob.
>
>
> --
> Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/)
>
> >
>


-- 
Sébastien Lelong
http://www.sirloon.net
http://sirbot.org

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to