Comment #2 on issue 49 by robhamerling: register naming in pic_data_eeprom
library for 16f916, 16f690 and others
http://code.google.com/p/jallib/issues/detail?id=49
Yes, that is a possibility. But I think I have a better solution. I could
not find
any functional differences for those registers as far as EEPROM handling is
concerned, so I added a construction like:
if (defined(EEDATA) == TRUE) then
EEDATA = data
elsif (defined(EEDAT) == TRUE) then
EEDAT = data
elsif (defined(EEDATL) == TRUE) then
EEDATL = data
end if
and a similar construction for EEADRL.
This makes the pic_data_eeprom libary more universal and now
also 'deviating' PICS
are supported. I just tested with success a 16F690.
BTW Initially I had also an else-part in the clause, like:
else
pragma error -- PIC not supported
to catch PICs which don't have EEPROM at all. But compile fails already
earlier on a
non existing EECON1 for these PICs. So I removed the else.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
