Hi Joep, > You once mentioned a blog. I think this would be a good idea if we > have progress to report at least once a week. And we should mail the > blog messages also to the jallist, since people don't vistit blogs > sites regularly unless they are realy interested.
I'd say not necessarily progress, just some thoughts is also ok. Some kind of summary of our discussion may also be interesting, a blog post being easier to read than a whole topic. > But to get back at the first condition: the progress we report has to > add value to the user. Sometimes we can go into an example or explain > about the structure. But we should also report of new features - > extended functionality of existing libs or new libs. OK > But then we also need to release more often. And maybe we should > forget about unvalidated vs validated and just build (weekly beta?) > snapshots of the tree we are working on. If this is also bundled with > the latest compiler, it would even be more attractive! A weekly release isn't compatible with validated/unvalidated. Since there's a lot of non-working code (ok, not a lot, but there's some) in unvalidated, I'd prefer keep validated. On the other side, what you propose may be enough: from unvalidated, only keep what compiles without errors: * I look for a sample * try to compile it * if ok, I grab all dependencies (libs) * if not, nothing This means the starting point are the samples, not the libs, which make sens since the only thing we can check is JSG. > So we can focus on making jallib better and people start using it and > do lots of testing. OK. Does this mean we'll also release *every* device files ? If we go this way, we should. -- Sébastien LELONG http://www.sirloon.net http://sirbot.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
