Hi Joep, Can we get back to your 16f88 board as the preferred one ?... :) I'm actually modifying mine a lot, and wouldn't want to break things.
For instance, I setup pwm on RB0, and not on RB3. Why ? Because I use a bootloader, and setting CCP1MUX on RB3 just don't work (yes, I should use xwisp, but using a bootloader saves me time). Since I did not yet use a LCD, and since LCD requires RB0, and since it may be possible to provide a sample with both LCD and PWM, my board is still a "work in progress" board, and as a result, shouldn't be considered as the preferred one. Cheers, Seb 2009/1/2 Joep Suijs <[email protected]> > > Good idea. I'll modify my boards and tests. > > Joep > > 2009/1/2, Sebastien LELONG <[email protected]>: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > I'm trying to write my first board file, board_16f88_sl.jal. Quite easy. > > Except the following: my board uses an internal oscillator by default. > When > > baudrate in test_serial_hardware is set to 115_200, it fails with pragma > > error (which is ok since it's too high). So, can't I use > > test_serial_hardware ? > > > > My question is: shouldn't baudrates be specified *in* the board files, > not in > > the sample ? > > > > > > Cheers, > > Seb > > -- > > Sébastien LELONG > > http://www.sirloon.net > > http://sirbot.org > > > > > > > > > > > -- Sébastien Lelong http://www.sirloon.net http://sirbot.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
