2009/1/19, Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]>: > Hi guys, > i2c_hw_slave_on_master_begins_to_write Do you mean 'master_writes_first_byte' or 'master_pre_write' ;)
> What do you think about this ? Is this pure nit-picking or philosophically > non-pragmatic ? In a word, who cares ? (except me, of course :)) Who is your audience? Some advances developers that that want to do more complex things then the to-be register-interface supports. They should (and will read) the AN. And if you provide a nice example with comment about each state, you can number the states similar to the AN and avoid just_not_clear_enough_function_names_to_write_such_a_complex_program_without_documentation() type function names ;) So if you aks me: - use simple names (state numbers, maybe with short name) - name the AN often enough - add comment in the example. Joep PS I care! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
