SSP1CON1, SSP1CON2, SSP2CON1, SSP2CON2... Errr....

OK, I understand those chips have 2 (M)SSP modules. If we follow previous 
convention (SSPCON or SSPCON/SSPCON2), this would give:

  - SSP1CON/SSP1CON2
  - SSP2CON/SSP2CON2

Does this make sense to you ?

About the two new device files, I agree with you that it's not worth it on 
their own.

Seb


Le Saturday 24 January 2009 17:26:44 Rob Hamerling, vous avez écrit :
> Sebastien Lelong wrote:
> > So, we have:
> >
> >  * 18 devices with two SSPCON,  named  SSPCON2 and SSPCON
> >  * 124 devices with two SSPCON, named SSPCON1 and SSPCON2
> >  * 2 devices with one SSPCON, named SSPCON1 (16f88 and 16f87)
> >  * 31 devices with one SSPCON, named SSPCON
> >  * and 1 device with one SSPCON, named SSPCON0 (!!! 16F687, named
> > "SSPCON" in datasheet)
> >
> > The global rules would be:
> >
> >  - if one SSP module, name it SSPCON
> >  - if two SSP module, name it SSPCON1 and SSPCON2
> >
> > ... Except datasheets seem to prefer SSPCON in *any* case. So having
> > SSPCON, and if available SSPCON2 would be nice IMHO. What's your point ?
>
> I think this would be a good approach: SSPCON and SSPCON2
> (please forget my previous suggestion).
>
> Your calculation ignores the SSP1CONx and SSP2CONx (in many of the
> 18Fs). Did you check these for possible conflicts, or do we ignore these
> for the moment?
>
> BTW: With MPlab 8.20 only 2 new device files would become available:
> 18F23K20 and 18F43K20 which are 'future products', hardly any need to
> put a new set of device files into Jallib. So I think I'll wait for the
> decision about SSPCON (re)naming.
>
> Regards, Rob.



-- 
Sébastien LELONG
http://www.sirloon.net
http://sirbot.org

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to