2009/4/19 Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]>: > Even if pins are input/analog as default, this is required: the lib itself > configure the pin as analog + input, we should be functionally-equivalent. > More, I don't know if it makes sens, but user could use either as input or > output within the same program.
Hi Seb, Setting the pins (back) to input is a nice additional safety feature, but AFAIK only required when the *user* has set the pin as output. So he probably knows which digital pin matched the analog pin and should be aware of the (obvious) double use. Basicly I agree we should be functional equivalent, but IMHO if it means a lot of additional work, we can - like in many more cases - assume the pin setting is default... Joep --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
