Hi Seb,
Sebastien Lelong wrote: > I may need your help about normalizing ANS bits... In some device files, you > can find ANS bits, like ANSEL_ASN2, in some other device files, you can find > ANSEL bits, like ANSEL_ANSEL2. Ex: for PIC 18lf13k22 (DS ref. 41365A), > device file defines ANSEL_ANSEL0, ..., ANSEL_ANSEL7, but in DS they are > referenced as ANS0, ..., ANS7 (see table page 213). > > Is it possible to normalize them either to ANSEL_ANSx or ANSEL_ANSELx ? I have done some reading.... It seems ANSEL_ANSx will be the better naming convention, and there are a number of issues to be solved....(as expected!). Some that came to mind: Should ANSEL0 and ANSEL1 (e.g. of 16HV785) be renamed to ANSEL and ANSELH (and of course the bits accordingly ANSEL_ANS0 etc)? What about the bits in ANSELH? Should these be called ANSEL_ANS8..ANSEL_ANS11 (as the bitnames are called in the DS of the 18lf13k20). How to name the bits of ANSELA/B/D/E of the 16f72x? Regards, Rob. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
