Comment #2 on issue 69 by robhamerling: I2C hardware does not work for PIC18F devices http://code.google.com/p/jallib/issues/detail?id=69
I don't see any follow up.... The device files have a different naming convention for the 18Fs compared to the baseline PICs on purpose, and yes the names are different than in the datasheets. See also devicefiles.html. At the time this was decided it was because no baseline PIC has more than one MSSP module and the SSP library was built for the baseline. I also think it was assumed that the for the 18Fs the library would need be adapted anyway, one of the reasons being the possibility of multiple MSSP modules. So I think the device files are OK and the library should be refactored, unless somebody has a better idea. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
