It seems a good idea when we are seeking to be complete. It is however a whole other category of use: applications where it pays off (literally) when the decive is $.50 cheaper - even when it can be programmed only once and (iicr) needs an other programmer.
If we want to go this path, we need to investigate what it takes to test with these devices, if these devices are realy that different from the F-types (and need an other device file) and if we know anybody that might go and use jal with otp devices. Joep 2009/6/16 Rob Hamerling <[email protected]> > > > Hi guys, > I was thinking ... how useful would it be to provide device files for > other than flash PICs? Why don't we support OTP PICs? > Regards, Rob. > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
