I can't tell you for all the details but you can have a look at  
adc_channels.jal where I already normalize them (named JALLIB_ANSx)

Seb

Le 2 juil. 09 à 15:43, Rob Hamerling <[email protected]> a  
écrit :

>
>
> Hi Seb,
>
> I've started with the normalization of the _ANS bits. This is rather
> simple for the ANSEL register, but it becomes  more complicated for  
> the
> other registers. I have a couple of questions for you:
>
> 1. With the baseline (ic 10F220/222, 12F510, 16F506/526) the bits  
> are in
> ADCON0. Do you want these to be called ADCON0_ANS0/1, or should it
> become something like:
>    var volatile bit ANSEL_ANS0  at ADCON0:6
> (see also item 5)
>
> 2. Should the ANS bits of ANSELH get a prefix ANSELH_ or ANSEL_?
>
> 3. Should the enumeration of ANS bits of ANSELH start with 0 or with  
> 8?
> Or should the start value depend on the number of active ANS bits in
> ANSEL (to become an contiguous series)?
>
> 4. Similarly what about PICs with ANSELA/ANSELB/ANSELE or ANSEL0/ 
> ANSEL1
> registers?
>
> 5. What about giving the all ANS bits a 'dummy'-registername, for  
> example:
>    var volatile bit JANSEL_ANS0  at ADCON0:6
>
> Regards, Rob.
>
> -- 
> Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/)
>
> >

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to