2009/7/19 Sunish Issac <[email protected]>: > What's on my site is what was extracted from the pjal docs specifically > chapter 21 in this case.
That pjal doc was my source too. I still think such a manual in an updated form would be very valueble. I know all information is there and Rob is right that a copy never will be the autoriative source. And my question proves why. But my question also proves that the info it too much scattered at the moment. And Seb's message in the other thread: > I don't know what is the current table of content, but something like this > would help using already existing doc: > > 1. jalv2 : the ultimate reference > 2. PICs modules > 3. Experiments & projects > The first step could be (1) and will be a major task on it's own. And as for the blog docs - they look good but I know it is a burden to create them with the tools provided. And the non-portable format makes it hard to reuse them for an other website or PDF document... For now, I have adapted this pragma description in my working copy and leave it at that (@seb: yes, it has to be at svn if we procede, and it will be, as it becomes clear we will procede. For now, it is a outdated document of which the rebuilding just started...) Joep --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
