> > > Now I'm about to update pinmap.py I see 2 methods of saying 'no alias' > in pinmap.py: > 1. do not mention the pin at all > 2. mention the pin, but only with its own name as alias > The first is probably the most efficient, but the second shows that the > pin is not (accidently) forgotten. > I think we should use only one method, and nevertheless the argument > above I would prefer the first. What's your opinion?
I prefer option 1 too. Pins can't be accidentally forgotten, a whole PIC can. (but pins can be wrong...) Seb --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
