Hi Joep,
Joep Suijs wrote: > Interesting :) > > The last lines of the asm are: > > l__l411 > sleep > goto l__l411 > end > > And if you put a forever-loop it becomes: > > ; 164 forever loop end loop > l__l374 > goto l__l374 > end > > and then the line is printed properly. Should we concider this a bug? Aha! I was focused on problems with libraries and overlooked the missing 'forever' loop. It explains the behaviour of his program. You saved me some debugging time! It may become a 'religious' discussion about what the compiler should do when the application program doesn't take care of controlling the behaviour of the PIC at the 'end' of a program. I think the current implementation with a sleep loop isn't that bad at all! But it should be documented! Regards, Rob. PS. Joep: 'con_s_ider' using a dictionary from time to time! -- Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
