If it were only 16 instructions, and/or if it were disabled by default, I have no problem with it.
But actually 16 instructions seems a very very low estimate, unless you also keep some sort of map or symbol table that helps you understand which libraries the 16 instructions relate to. I was assuming something a very verbose, flattened ascii path name/library name, plus a SVN revision string, per library. William On Oct 10, 3:49 pm, Joep Suijs <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Seb, > > > I'm quite surprised by replies here, where few bytes would be used to put > > a version number in a way or another. I can> remember discussions about > optimizing code space, the most we can... 0.5% > > of code space for this seems huge, don't you think ? > > 0.5% of 16kbyte flash are 16 instructions, which is less space then > required to add a constant to a dword. So not huge IMO, as long as it is > usefull. > > > Yep, not a good idea IMHO... > > Then it takes too much space ;) > Joep --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
