Greetings Seb, You're right of course, using the names would be more clear. When I have some time, I will study them, re-code, and re-test, and revise the entry in SVN. It may be a while though.
I will say, though, the configuration bits are very important, and sometimes the poor user really should study the datasheet carefully. But thanks for the reminder - I do get lazy now and then. About the nop's, I will add some comments to explain that when changing the oscillator's frequency drastically, I think it is safest to add a little delay before trying to do any 'real work'. In retrospect, this might be a good place for me to use that nice inline delay routine instead of the nops. William On Oct 16, 12:41 am, Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi William, > > > +include 16f819 > > +pragma target fuses 0x3F30 > > I think it's better to use named fuse, one by one > > > +pragma target clock 8_000_000 > > + > > +OSCCON = 0x70 > > If like 16f88, this is just about IRCF bits. You could: > > OSCCON_IRCF = 0b_111 -- I don't know the correct value for you > > > +asm nop > > +asm nop > > Why those "asm nop" ? > > Cheers, > Seb --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
