Hi William, William wrote:
> While I understand the need to test the beta compiler, and why > buildbot is using it, I do have a concern -- How do we know that we > are all testing against the exact same 'beta compiler' ? From time to time I check with Kyle's site which is the latest and I'll always work with the newest. > Until today, I have been simply running the Windows binary of the > 'beta jalv2' compiler. However, now I need to build the 'beta jalv2' > compiler on FreeBSD. I was having problems, so I dropped back and > tried to build JALV2 on my Ubuntu system, with GCC 4.3.3. The build > fails: jal_tokn.c:406: error: format not a string literal and no > format arguments. Since Kyle doesn't provide an executable for eComStation I'll always have to compile from the source. I'm using the Open Watcom C/C++ 1.8 compiler without problems not for the beta and not for any older version. > Now, I can probably troubleshoot this and get back to building on > FreeBSD, but it does concern me that as far as I can tell, there is no > real way to know for sure that we are all running the same JALV2. > This seems like a problem to me... Could be when we have different results, and then it would be easy to check the versions (by archive date , not compile date!). But as far as I remember we never had a discussion about this. Regards, Rob. -- Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
