Hi,

This should be answered/put on PIClist...


Cheers,
Seb

2009/12/17 funlw65 <[email protected]>

> SDCC have often a bad attitude. It sometimes crashing without a clue.
> Can't face any type of project and support for 16F's is poor. SDCC
> don't have reports about memory occupied and such as JAL is reporting
> after a successful compilation.
>
> SDCC is too general (and mainly for 8051) and generate a big code.
> Can't stand up against JAL. Not even against PMP (Pic Micro Pascal), a
> free Turbo Pascal french compiler for 12F, 16F, 18F which generate
> assembler for MPLAB and have a FP Math for 18F's and some of 16F's.
>
> SDCC is forcing you to look for other solutions....
>
> Vasi
>
> On Dec 17, 10:40 am, Rob Hamerling <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Sunish Issac wrote:
> > > New question there, what are the advantages of jalv2 over sdcc.
> >
> > For me crucial: I did not succeed in compiling SDCC for my favorite OS:
> > eComStation (OS/2). Otherwise I might not have switched to Jal at all!
> >
> > Regards, Rob.
> >
> > --
> > Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/)
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "jallib" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<jallib%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
>
>
>


-- 
Sébastien Lelong
http://www.sirloon.net
http://sirbot.org

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.


Reply via email to