And buildbot would have failed before :) Seb
2010/2/19 Rob Hamerling <[email protected]> > > > Kyle wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:53:00 +0100, Rob Hamerling wrote >> >>> BTW: The warning (with _warn) causes a non-zero returncode by the >>> compiler. >>> >> >> Uh, no it doesn't. Look at jal_main.c. It returns EXIT_SUCCESS if there >> are no >> *errors*, EXIT_FAILURE otherwise. If EXIT_FAILURE is returned, all derived >> files (asm/hex/cod/lst/log) are removed. >> > > You're right, was a wrong observation of mine! > > > Regards, Rob. > > -- > Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jallib" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<jallib%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en. > > -- Sébastien Lelong http://www.sirloon.net http://sirbot.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
