Hi Joep,
Joep Suijs wrote:
2010/2/28 Rob Hamerling <[email protected]>:
Do we need more proof that inline is better (before I change the device
files)?
It won't be better in all cases from program memory size. But the way
I look at it is: since single pin operations are inline, so should
nibble operations.
(and I don't think there is a case to remove inline from single pin operations.)
I'll make the nibble routines inline and make a comparison of the
results for a few programs (before committing the device files!).
Programs using the 4-bit LCD library will probably give sufficient info.
Regards, Rob.
--
Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
