Hi Rob, 2010/3/25 Rob Hamerling <[email protected]>
> > Hi Seb, > > On 03/25/10 12:35 pm, Sebastien Lelong wrote: > >> If user says "set_analog_pin(5), then >> it should act on pin AN5 (not RA5 for instance). The question now is: >> what if there's no AN5 pin? >> > > Due to an little error in the Dev2Jal script some of the latest device > files have JANSEL_ANSx declarations for non-existing ADC channels. That is > not too bad, unless you check on defined(JANSEL_ANSx) and not on > defined(pin_ANx). BTW my error was in this check! > Then we have a problem, this is exactly what I do... See adc_channels.jal. > It seems unlikely to me that the different packages have different > electronics (for example more active ADC channels). But it could be that > 44-pin QFN packages have more active pins than their 40 PDIP counterparts. > Or am I seeing ghosts? > More GND pins on 44 pins package ? Cheers, Seb -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
