On Apr 9, 10:19 am, Joep Suijs <[email protected]> wrote: > > You choose a quite-similar name and that is a good idea if the library > library provides similar functionality. Iirc changing the isr to a > poll-procedure should do the job. And if you add the call to each > interval check, it is invisible for the user. Of course the > documentation should inform the user should at least check the (a) > timout as as frequent as the choosen interval. And if you create a > test file too, it would be perfect :) >
Thanks, will do. In fact, the test file may look strangely familiar also. :-) William -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
