On Apr 15, 4:01 am, Joep Suijs <[email protected]> wrote: > > pragma : 'pragma'^ ( > ... > | ( 'data' constant '-' constant (',' constant '-' constant)* ) >
Hi Joep, I still don't get it. If what you're saying is true, then why doesn't the 'pragma' itself get treated as an IDENTIFIER? It may be worthwhile to have some small JAL 'regression' tests that I can look at, not just Antlr grammar syntax. Show me some actual JAL code that breaks. I'll run it here for myself, and then probably I will 'get it through my thick skull'. :-) Thanks, William ps: sleep may help. I'll try that and check back when I wake up. :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
