Thanks Joep, so is the library ok with you now? I will continue to do some testing before I release it.
I don't think I would be able to make a large queue library because of my lack of ASM knowledge, and don't quite understand how and why yours is interrupt safe. I am also sure nobody would accept/use it even if I tried since it would not have the 10 years usage that your queue lib has to prove that it is interrupt safe. I think only the creator of the current lib (you) would be able to upgrade it. Matt. On Sep 14, 4:51 pm, Joep Suijs <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > 2010/9/14 mattschinkel <[email protected]>:> I thought it would be > useful, but I'll take it out anyways. I could do > > the same within another lib, or leave it up to the user. > > For the record: I don't say its not usefull. All I say it is a > separate topic. Library design requires (amongst others) good > segmentation. > > > I still think we need a solution for larger queues. 256 bytes is not > > very much compared to PIC sizes these days. The PIC's I use have 4kb > > ram, this gives me space for the program and debugging. > > So what keeps you from creating one? > > Joep -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
