Thanks for the clarification!
> For faster > reading/writing, > you should use read_sector() Err, not yet... on 32MHz, pata_hd_read_data() gave me about 320kbytes/s, while read_sector() gave about 130kbyte/s. When large_array is not used, read_sector() yields about 520kbytes/s. (Didn't write that numbers down, so it's very approximately.) My measurements showed me, that read_sector() indeed uses much RAM to be even slower than read_data(). > I have done many modifications already to the hard disk/sd > card > libraries, Ok, time to svn up :-) > so let me know what suggestions you have You'll regret that one ;-) > As for fat32, it needs a lot more work to be more user > friendly, yes... I've tried the sample program on a 18F4520. It did not work. Why it didn't work will stay fat32's secret :-) We'll get it fixed sooner or later. Greets, Kiste -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
