I did a speed test to compare both read sector procedures. I tried your speed test example at 24mhz
504,320 - first read_sector procedure 495,616 - 2nd read_sector procedure There is only a 1.7% speed reduction for read_sector_address(dword in address). We'll use this one because of it's advantage for MSD, and we don't need to use start_read/stop_read. PS.. Just for kicks... if you put a constant in the array locations and forget about the "for loop" you can get the bits one by one. You add 4kb to your program space and get a speed of: 1,590,272 I don't think your script is that accurate however (maybe it's my OSC speed). My scope shows about 2.4MBps! Matt. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
