> > So why is it called glcd_common if it is not common to all glcd's? > > I doubt if you are interested in the answer. But if you do you, just > think about it for a minute and you can imagine why - you are a smart > guy. And as an alternative, read back the postings on the topic at the > time the lib was created.
I read back on old messages. I didn't find any reason why glcd_common is not for all glcd's. There is mention that all GLCD's are different, which is true, but there are also similarities which should be in glcd_common. Is this correct? Matt. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
