2011/1/8 mattschinkel <[email protected]>: > I think these libraries should be updated to save on cycles. I think > this is better then readability in this case. I don't think anyone > would have the need edit print.jal. If you want to keep readability, > you can put the old print.jal at the bottom of the file commented out > completely so someone may replace a procedure if needed. > Sorry to disagree on all of this. - Everybody except you seem to be concerned about flash/ram/stack use. - Bad readebility is bad for maintenance and means more bugs. - Leaving old code is useless and overhead, but probably the least bad idea of the above. One should add decent comment if code itself is not obvious.
Joep -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
