2011/1/11 mattschinkel <[email protected]>: > I think additional "formatting" would be useful in format.jal I second that. This is the reason print.jal was created in the first place. The reason this is suggested means there is something wrong with format.jal ;) I am not happy with the fixed-point function in print.jal either. Don't know who added it, but it not belong there IMO (and I even think it does not work properly in all cases). And if we add such functionality, the fixed point shoud be user-placable, not fixed. And there should be functions for all variable types that are supported by the other functions too.
And for the original question: I don't object to adding, but urge you to add the functions for other variable sizes too. Joep -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
