Actually, in this case, I don't need to modify the lib. I can feed a blank variable as a seed, or find another method.
I'm sorry I have wasted everyone's time, but at least I understand it now! Matt. On Feb 17, 8:12 am, mattschinkel <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks again for your time on this Kiste, I tested your code and it > does work. Maybe we can move to this code as it is more random then > the current set constant. The user can of course set a real random > value if they wish. > > To test how random this is, I would have to do more tests and only > record the startup value. I'm sure I'll find that this value is not as > random as I had thought. > > Matt. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
