Comment #3 on issue 154 by sebastien.lelong: USB RAM locations (BDT & Data) http://code.google.com/p/jallib/issues/detail?id=154
For now I can only see USB_BASE_ADDRESS as a required constant. Benefits will be immediate: all USB PIC, declared in devicespecific.json will be properly configured, other will fail (which clearly is good).
According to the name, it declares the beginning of USB RAM, but in USB libraries, an assumption is made: beginning of USB RAM is also the BDT locations. This isn't true for 18F27J53 for instance, though remaining USB RAM after BDT makes the whole thing working good.
So, to sum up, I'm not sure yet about the name. I'd say to be explicit and name it USB_BDT_ADDRESS. What's your opinion on this ?
Seb -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
