Hey Seb, Maybe we can review this library a bit more before releasing. Should we stick with null terminated strings in all libraries? Are there any other changes that should be made?
Matt. On May 31, 3:19 am, mattschinkel <[email protected]> wrote: > It was not in 0.6 so please remove it from 0.7, If it's ok with you. > > I don't think it will break anything. Please check. > > Matt. > > On May 31, 1:38 am, Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Matt, > > > Sorry I couldn't find time... Maybe this WE, I'm not sure. If not, I can put > > a "temporary" notice claiming this will change. Was it release in 0.6 ? If > > no, we could remove it... > > > Cheers, > > Seb > > > 2011/5/31 mattschinkel <[email protected]> > > > > > OK, I'll modify this. > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Seb > > > > I noticed that the procedure names have still not been changed. Can we > > > either fix this or remove strings.jal from torelease? Maybe we should > > > review this library more before releasing. > > > > The only library of mine that uses this is networking, and it is not > > > released. > > > > Matt. > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "jallib" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]. > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en. > > > -- > > Sébastien Lelong > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
