> Joep, what would you prefer? Anyone else have an opinion? I do not have a "NULL" key on my keyboard, and my terminal does not display a "NULL" character.
Wikipedia says: "0 (null, NUL, \0, ^@), originally intended to be an ignored character, but now used by many programming languages to mark the end of a string." If someone wants to give a special meaning to this character within his program, I feel like he has to cope with the consequences. I think the "null" should mark the end of a string, and to not always waste a byte, str[count(str)] should be considered an implicit "null". So I would agree with matt's proposed implementation, at least concerning the logic. Greets, Kiste -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
