Oh... yes, it was a mistake. I'll fix. Matt.
On Jun 4, 3:38 pm, Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]> wrote: > it is the original purpose indeed. > seb > > -- > Sébastien Lelong > > Le 4 juin 2011 à 20:27, William <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > Greetings, > > > If 'atoi()' was intended to behave anything like its "C" cousin, its > > purpose would be to convert an ascii string (which represents a > > integer), to a binary value. So the suggestion to use string_compare > > seems incorrect to me also. > > > William > > > On Jun 4, 11:00 am, mattschinkel <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> _warn "atoi() is depreciated, please use string_compare." > > >>> Sounds like a mistake ? > > >> no mistake here, see revision 2690 > > >> Matt. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "jallib" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] > > . > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en > > . > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
