Comment #6 on issue 159 by robhamerling: Jallib device files optimization
http://code.google.com/p/jallib/issues/detail?id=159
Amendment of previous suggestion by Gordon Williams:
var volatile byte _PORTA at 0x05
var byte PORTA at _PORTA ;takes place of get function
var byte _port_A_shadow
procedure PORTA'put(byte in x at _port_A_shadow ) is
pragma inline
_PORTA = _port_A_shadow
end procedure
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.