On 07/30/11 06:03 am, mattschinkel wrote:
I verified 18f67j50. LED blinks at the correct speed.
Thanks! So I can add that family to TORELEASE too.
Although your blink sample is working, isn't it desirable to have less hardware? Maybe internal OSC is better?
Well, the main purposes of these 'usb-blink' samples was to provide a model of how to setup a PIC with USB, in particular the oscillator. I think a serious USB device needs a crystal or resonator. Do you think most users would use the internal oscillator? It would be a piece of cake to generate a similar set of samples using the internal oscillator, but there are already so many blink samples, wouldn't that become a matter of "not see the wood for the trees"?
Regards, Rob. -- R. Hamerling, Netherlands --- http://www.robh.nl -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
