that sounds logical, but you should extremely careful (test) while changing this. do you think your problem comes from here? cheers seb Le 10 nov. 2011 19:21, "mattschinkel" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > var volatile byte usb_bd_array[ 255 ] at ( USB_BASE_ADDRESS + 0x0000 ) > > So I just notced that this bd array (buffer descriptors array) is only > 255 bytes, but I think it should be 256 bytes since it is located from > 400h to 4FFh. > > Maybe you can have a quick look and tell me what you think. Page 365 > http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/39931d.pdf > > Matt. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en. >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
