Actually, should they be changed to eeprom_24lcxxx_......jal ? On Apr 24, 8:18 pm, mattschinkel <[email protected]> wrote: > For naming, I would just go with eeprom_24lc256_extended.jal. I don't > mind changing the original to _simple, but if we do it with this one > the same should be done in the future on other libs. > > Matt.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
