Hi Rob, > I'm afraid the following samples have some issues still: > > 12hv615_blink > 12hv615_temperature_fan > 16f648a_backlight > 16f648a_pwm_led > 16f723_pwm_led > 16f73_pwm2 > 16f73_pwm_led > 16f877a_backlight > 16f877a_pwm2 > 16f877a_pwm_led > 16f877a_servo_rc_slave > 16f877_backlight > 16f877_pwm2 > 16f877_pwm_led > 16f877_servo_rc_slave > 16f886_pwm_adc_res > 16f88_backlight > 16f88_ir_ranger_gp2d02 > 16f88_pwm_led > 18f14k50_pwm_led > 18f2450_pwm_led > 18f2620_pwm_led > 18f27j53_sd_card_minix_read > 18f4525_servo_rc_slave > 18f452_servo_rc_slave > 18f4550_pwm_led > 18f4550_servo_rc_slave > 18f4620_servo_rc_slave > > I'll try to analyse these ASAP. If possible I'll correct 'm. > I've no objections against help by the original author....
I had some difficulty in finding the actual issues. What I did is regenerate all samples and check for 'deprecated' in the redirected output. If there are still warnings in the re-generated samples, I'll check again. A reference to the test-file involved would be helpful. I've given up on samples that have been generated in the past, but are not generated any more. It's quite time-consuming to manage them in the current structure and various attempts to adapt the structure of samples have been unsuccessful. I suggest we remove all samples in this category that have warnings. > There are probably a few samples which have to be modified. > Some samples use a (byte) ADC-value (0..255) and feed it directly to a (now > deprecated) PWM procedure. This byte value has to be changed to one of > these: > - adjusted properly to a word value 0..1023 for ...pwm_ratio() > - converted to a percentage 0..100 for ...pwm_precent() I made those changes in the process, so that should be okay. Joep -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
