Best wishes to you, too! And thanks for the information about the tranquility of buildbot ;-)
I've done a quick check with the only sample which uses this function (18f27j53_sd_card_minix_demo.jal). Apart from a not measured saving in processor cycles, 300 bytes of code and 6 bytes of data are saved with the new implementation. I didn't expect that much, but it may well be that those were the only divisions in that sample. Compiled with -no-variable-reuse when the first try didn't finish after two hours. Greets, Kiste > >Hi kiste >Best wishes for 2013 and for all of us here! >Iirc buildbot won't trigger a build before 3h without commits >Cheers >Seb >Le 4 janv. 2013 10:40, <[email protected]> a écrit : > >Revision: 3160 >>Author: [email protected] >>Date: Fri Jan 4 01:40:24 2013 >>Log: Wait, buildbot! Try again now :-) >>http://code.google.com/p/jallib/source/detail?r=3160 >> >>Modified: >> /trunk/include/jal/strings.jal >> >>-- >>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>"jallib" group. >>To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>[email protected]. >>For more options, visit this group at >>http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en. >> >> -- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"jallib" group. >To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >[email protected]. >For more options, visit this group at >http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
